Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 83
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(7): 501-506, 2023 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37276058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Two novel pediatric trauma scoring tools, SIPAB+ (defined as elevated SIPA with Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8) and rSIG (reverse Shock Index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale and defined as abnormal using cutoffs for early outcomes), which combine neurological status with Pediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index (SIPA), have been shown to predict early trauma outcomes better than SIPA alone. We sought to determine if one more accurately identifies children in need of trauma team activation. METHODS: Patients 1 to 18 years old from the 2014-2018 Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program database were included. Sensitivity and specificity for SIPAB+ and rSIG were calculated for components of pediatric trauma team activation, based on criteria standard definitions. RESULTS: There were 11,426 patients (1.9%) classified as SIPAB+ and 235,672 (39.0%) as having an abnormal rSIG. SIPAB+ was consistently more specific, with specificities exceeding 98%, but its sensitivity was poor (<30%) for all outcomes. In comparison, rSIG was a more sensitive tool, with sensitivities exceeding 60%, and specificity values exceeded 60% for all outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Trauma systems must determine their priorities to decide how best to incorporate SIPAB+ and rSIG into practice, although rSIG may be preferred as it balances both sensitivity and specificity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Estudios Retrospectivos , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Presión Sanguínea , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
2.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 8(1): e001017, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37342820

RESUMEN

Objectives: Our understanding of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) has changed significantly in recent decades, resulting in a heterogeneous description of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the literature which is not suitable for data pooling. Therefore, we endeavored to develop a core outcome set (COS) to help guide future BCVI research and overcome the challenge of heterogeneous outcomes reporting. Methods: After a review of landmark BCVI publications, content experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study. For round 1, participants submitted a list of proposed core outcomes. In subsequent rounds, panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to score the proposed outcomes for importance. Core outcomes consensus was defined as >70% of scores receiving 7 to 9 and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds, and four rounds of deliberation were performed to re-evaluate the variables not achieving predefined consensus criteria. Results: From an initial panel of 15 experts, 12 (80%) completed all rounds. A total of 22 items were considered, with 9 items achieving consensus for inclusion as core outcomes: incidence of postadmission symptom onset, overall stroke incidence, stroke incidence stratified by type and by treatment category, stroke incidence prior to treatment initiation, time to stroke, overall mortality, bleeding complications, and injury progression on radiographic follow-up. The panel further identified four non-outcome items of high importance for reporting: time to BCVI diagnosis, use of standardized screening tool, duration of treatment, and type of therapy used. Conclusion: Through a well-accepted iterative survey consensus process, content experts have defined a COS to guide future research on BCVI. This COS will be a valuable tool for researchers seeking to perform new BCVI research and will allow future projects to generate data suitable for pooled statistical analysis with enhanced statistical power. Level of evidence: Level IV.

3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 95(3): 347-353, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36899455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Appropriate prehospital trauma triage ensures transport of children to facilities that provide specialized trauma care. There are currently no objective and generalizable scoring tool for emergency medical services to facilitate such decisions. An abnormal reverse shock index times Glasgow Coma Scale (rSIG), which is calculated using readily available parameters, has been shown to be associated with severely injured children. This study sought to determine if rSIG could be used in the prehospital setting to identify injured children who require the highest levels of care. METHODS: Patients (1-18 years old) transferred from the scene to a level 1 pediatric trauma center from 2010 to 2020 with complete prehospital and emergency department vital signs, and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores were included. Reverse shock index times GCS was calculated as previously described ((systolic blood pressure/heart rate) × GCS), and the following cutoffs were used: ≤13.1, ≤16.5, and ≤20.1 for 1- to 6-, 7- to 12-, and 13- to 18-year-old patients, respectively. Trauma activation level and clinical outcomes upon arrival to the pediatric trauma center were collected. RESULTS: There were 247 patients included in the analysis; 66.0% (163) had an abnormal prehospital rSIG. Patients with an abnormal rSIG had a higher rate of highest-level trauma activation compared with those with a normal rSIG (38.7% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.013). Patients with an abnormal prehospital rSIG also had higher rates of intubation (28.8% vs. 9.52%, p < 0.001), intracranial pressure monitor (9.20 vs. 1.19%, p = 0.032), need for blood (19.6% vs. 8.33%, p = 0.034), laparotomy (7.98% vs. 1.19%, p = 0.039), and intensive care unit admission (54.6% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Reverse shock index times GCS may assist emergency medical service providers in early identification and triage of severely injured children. An abnormal rSIG in the emergency department is associated with higher rates of intubation, need for blood transfusion, intracranial pressure monitoring, laparotomy, and intensive care unit admission. Use of this metric may help to speed the identification, care, and treatment of any injured child. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Pronóstico , Signos Vitales , Centros Traumatológicos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Pediatr Surg ; 58(2): 320-324, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36400606

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Most children in the US live more than one hour from a Level 1 PTC. The Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) score was developed to assess trauma triage criteria and is dependent on whether someone requires one of six urgent interventions (NFTI+). We sought to determine if a novel scoring tool, rSIG, could predict NFTI and facilitate the transfer decision making process. METHODS: Children 1-18 years old transferred to our level 1 PTC from 2010 - 2020 with complete vital signs and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at the transferring facility were included. rSIG was calculated as previously described [(SBP/HR) x GCS], and the following cutoffs were used for each age group: ≤13.1, ≤16.5, and ≤20.1 for 1-6, 7-12, and 13-18 years, respectively. Clinical outcomes upon arrival to the PTC were collected to determine if patients met any NTFI criteria. RESULTS: A total of 456 patients met inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with an abnormal rSIG was 60.1% (274) and 37.0% (169) were NFTI+. Patients with an abnormal rSIG had an odds ratio of 6.18 (95% CI: 3.90, 10.07), p < 0.001 of being NFTI+ compared to those with a normal rSIG. CONCLUSION: Children with an abnormal rSIG are more likely to be NFTI+ and require higher levels of care, indicating this scoring tool can identify pediatric trauma patients who may benefit from expedited transfer. Incorporating rSIG into initial evaluation and triage of traumatically injured children may expedite the transfer decision making process and limit delays in transport to a PTC. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Comparative Study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Niño , Lactante , Preescolar , Adolescente , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Estudios Retrospectivos , Triaje , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
5.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 45(3): 137-142, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36031190

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion is a lifesaving intervention that also has proinflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Adults with a malignancy who receive PRBC transfusion have increased rates of infection, tumor recurrence, and decreased survival. The effect of PRBC transfusion among children with solid tumors is unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all children who underwent operative resection of a solid tumor malignancy. Data collected included demographic information, location of operation, nadir hemoglobin, and any PRBC transfusion within 30 days of tumor resection. RESULTS: Three hundred sixty children underwent tumor resection at our institution between 2002 and 2013; 194 (54%) received a perioperative blood transfusion. After adjusting for stage at diagnosis, tumor location, preoperative chemotherapy and nadir hemoglobin, blood transfusion was associated with a higher rate of postoperative infectious complications, shorter disease-free interval, and a higher rate of tumor recurrence. Each additional transfused unit increased the risk of postoperative infection (odds ratio 3.83; 95% confidence interval 1.21, 14.22, P =0.031). CONCLUSIONS: Among children with solid tumor malignancies, PRBC transfusion within 30 days of operation is associated with higher rates of postoperative infection. If transfusion becomes necessary, single unit increments should be transfused. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hemoglobinas
6.
J Surg Res ; 279: 17-24, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35716446

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Elevated shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) has been shown to be associated with the need for both blood transfusion and intervention in pediatric patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries (BLSI). SIPA has traditionally been used as a binary value, which can be classified as elevated or normal, and this study aimed to assess if discreet values above SIPA cutoffs are associated with an increased probability of blood transfusion and failure of nonoperative management (NOM) in bluntly injured children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children aged 1-18 y with any BLSI admitted to a Level-1 pediatric trauma center between 2009 and 2020 were analyzed. Blood transfusion was defined as any transfusion within 24 h of arrival, and failure of NOM was defined as any abdominal operation or angioembolization procedure for hemorrhage control. The probabilities of receiving a blood transfusion or failure of NOM were calculated at different increments of 0.1. RESULTS: There were 493 patients included in the analysis. The odds of requiring blood transfusion increased by 1.67 (95% CI 1.49, 1.90) for each 0.1 unit increase of SIPA (P < 0.001). A similar trend was seen initially for the probability of failure of nonoperative management, but beyond a threshold, increasing values were not associated with failure of NOM. On subanalysis excluding patients with a head injury, increased 0.1 increments were associated with increased odds for both interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Discreet values above age-related SIPA cutoffs are correlated with higher probabilities of blood transfusion in pediatric patients with BLSI and failure of NOM in those without head injury. The use of discreet values may provide clinicians with more granular information about which patients require increased resources upon presentation.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales , Choque , Heridas no Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominales/complicaciones , Niño , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia
7.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt A): 13-17, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35232541

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adolescents with blunt solid organ injuries (BSOI) are cared for at both pediatric trauma centers (PTC) and adult trauma centers (ATC). Over the past decade, treatment strategies have shifted towards non-operative management with reported favorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare management strategies and outcomes between PTC and ATC. METHODS: We queried the 2016-2018 Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) datasets to identify adolescents between the ages of 16 and 19 with BSOI. Characteristics were stratified by center type (pediatric or adult) for comparative analyses. Separate logistic regressions were used to assess the association of hospital type, location of injury, age, gender, weight, Glascow Coma Score (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Among the 3,011,310 patients enrolled in the 2016-2018 TQIP datasets, 106,892 (3.5%) had a BSOI ICD9/10 code. Of those, 9,193 (8.6%) were between 16 and 19 years of age and included in this analysis. Within this cohort, 6,073 (66.1%) were managed at an ATC and 3,120 (33.9%) were managed at a PTC. While statistically different, there were no clinically relevant differences for age, weight, and sex between groups. A significantly higher ISS and lower GCS score were observed among those admitted to ATC compared to PTC. ICU admissions were more frequent at ATC. Number of blood transfusions by 4 h after presentation were also higher among those admitted to an ATC. Despite a lower ISS and higher GCS at presentation, mortality was higher among those treated at a PTC with an odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of 2.42 (1.31-4.53). After excluding adolescents with a traumatic brain injury, a common cause of mortality among adolescent trauma patients, these differences in outcomes persisted. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that adolescents with BSOI managed at a PTC are less likely to receive blood transfusions by 4 h of admission or be admitted to the ICU than those managed at an ATC. However, this more conservative approach may come at the expense of higher overall mortality. Further work is needed to understand these differences and determine if PTC need to be more aggressive in managing BSOI.


Asunto(s)
Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
8.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 92(1): 69-73, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34932042

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) predicts the need for increased resources and mortality among pediatric trauma patients without incorporating neurological status. A new scoring tool, rSIG, which is the reverse shock index (rSI) multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), has been proven superior at predicting outcomes in adult trauma patients and mortality in pediatric patients compared with traditional scoring systems. We sought to compare the accuracy of rSIG to Shock Index (SI) and SIPA in predicting the need for early interventions in civilian pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: Patients (aged 1-18 years) in the 2014 to 2018 Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program database with complete heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and total GCS were included. Optimal cut points of rSIG were calculated for predicting blood transfusion within 4 hours, intubation, intracranial pressure monitoring, and intensive care unit admission. From the optimal thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve were calculated from receiver operating characteristics analyses to predict each outcome and compared with SI and SIPA. RESULTS: A total of 604,931 patients with a mean age of 11.1 years old were included. A minority of patients had a penetrating injury mechanism (5.6%) and the mean Injury Severity Score was 7.6. The mean SI and rSIG scores were 0.85 and 18.6, respectively. Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale performed better than SI and SIPA at predicting early trauma outcomes for the overall population, regardless of age. CONCLUSION: Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale outperformed SI and SIPA in the early identification of traumatically injured children at risk for early interventions, such as blood transfusion within 4 hours, intubation, intracranial pressure monitoring, and intensive care unit admission. Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale adds neurological status in initial patient assessment and may be used as a bedside triage tool to rapidly identify pediatric patients who will likely require early intervention and higher levels of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Médica Temprana , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Ajuste de Riesgo , Choque , Heridas y Lesiones , Presión Sanguínea , Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Intervención Médica Temprana/normas , Femenino , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Presión Intracraneal , Masculino , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/métodos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/normas , Proyectos de Investigación , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/normas , Choque/diagnóstico , Choque/etiología , Choque/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología
9.
J Pediatr Surg ; 57(7): 1358-1362, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34955290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac injuries are rare in pediatric trauma patients and data regarding this type of injury is limited. There is even less data on traumatic great vessel injuries. This study sought to examine and summarize our recent experience at two pediatric trauma centers, which serve a major metropolitan area and large geographic region. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of pediatric (<18 years) patients who sustained cardiac or great vessel injuries and were managed at a Level 1 or Level 2 pediatric trauma center between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2020. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests, Fisher's exact tests and chi-squared tests for continuous, non-normally distributed continuous, and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients sustained cardiac and/or great vessel injuries. Of these, 37 (70%) sustained cardiac, 9 (17%) sustained great vessel, and 7 (13%) sustained both types of injuries. The median age was 14.9 years and 74% (n = 39) were male. The median injury severity score (ISS) was 36.0 and the injury mechanism was blunt in 31 (58%) patients. The most common cardiac and great vessel injury locations were left ventricle (n = 9) and thoracic aorta (n = 11), respectively. The overall mortality rate was 53% (n = 28). Mortality was highest among those who sustained great vessel injuries (89%). CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial heterogeneity in cardiac and great vessel injuries. Regardless, they are highly morbid and lethal, despite aggressive surgical and catheter-based interventions.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Cardíacas , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular , Heridas no Penetrantes , Adolescente , Aorta Torácica/lesiones , Niño , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/etiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/epidemiología , Lesiones del Sistema Vascular/cirugía , Heridas no Penetrantes/epidemiología , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía
10.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(7): 1219-1223, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31133284

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management protocols of blunt liver and spleen injury in children usually call for serial monitoring of the child's hemoglobin and hematocrit (H/H) at scheduled intervals. We previously demonstrated that the need for emergent intervention is triggered by changes in vital signs, not the findings of scheduled blood draws and changed our protocol accordingly. The current aim is to evaluate the safety of this change. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all children admitted following blunt liver or spleen injury during two periods; the historic cohort 1/09-12/13 and the protocol cohort 8/15-7/17. Data evaluated included the need for intervention, number of H/H checks, and outcomes. RESULTS: 330 children were included (216 historic; 114 protocol). Groups did not differ in percentage of male patients, injury severity score, or GCS. Median age in the historic cohort was younger than the protocol cohort (9 vs 12 years; p = 0.02). More children in the protocol group had a grade 5 injury (1% vs 9%; p < 0.0001). Groups did not differ in the number who required intervention or discharge disposition (including mortality). The protocol group had fewer H/H checks (median 5 vs 4, p < 0.0001); the two groups did not differ in their nadir H/H. The historic group had a longer median hospital length of stay (3 days vs 2, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the number of scheduled blood draws following a blunt liver or spleen injury in children is safe. Additional benefits include a decrease in the number of blood draws and a decrease in length of hospital stay. STUDY TYPE: Cost-effectiveness. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Hígado/lesiones , Flebotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Bazo/lesiones , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(9): 1740-1743, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30661643

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVC) are vital to the management of critically ill children. Despite efforts to minimize complications, central line associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and venous thromboembolisms (VTE) still occur. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database for children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) between November 2013 and December 2016. RESULTS: In total, 2714 CVC were in place, 979 of which were percutaneous CVC. During the study period, 21 CLABSI (1.6/1000 line days) were identified, of which, nearly half (n = 9, 42.9%) were associated with percutaneous CVC (2.6/1000 line days). Poisson regression analysis did not identify a single risk factor for CLABSI when adjusting for line type, anatomic location and laterality of placement, geographic location of placement, length of PICU admission, presence of gastrostomy tube, concurrent mechanical ventilation, age, weight, and height. Forty clinically significant VTE (2.9/1000 line days) were identified, with percutaneous CVC having the highest incidence (7.5/1000 line days, p < 0.001). Of percutaneous CVC, clinically significant VTE were more often associated with femoral vein cannulation (14.8/1000 line days) compared to internal jugular and subclavian vein (2.5 and 2.4/1000 line days, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This data suggests that the femoral site may be an important risk factor that should be considered in prevention strategies for catheter-associated VTE in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Trombosis , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis/epidemiología , Trombosis/etiología
12.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 34(8): 857-860, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29876644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The utility of EDT in the adult trauma population, using well-defined guidelines, is well established, especially for penetrating injuries. Since the introduction of these guidelines, reports on the use of EDT for pediatric trauma have been published, and these series reveal a dismal, almost universally fatal, outcome for EDT following blunt trauma in the child. This report reviews the clinical outcomes of EDT in the pediatric population. MATERIALS/METHODS: We performed a review of EDT in the pediatric population using the published data from 1980 to 2017. Variables extracted included mechanism of injury and mortality. To minimize bias, single case reports were not included in the review. RESULTS: Upon review of four decades of published literature on the use of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) in the pediatric population, mortality rates are comparable between adults and pediatric patients for penetrating thoracic trauma. In contrast, in pediatric patients sustaining blunt trauma, no patient under the age of 15 has survived. CONCLUSION: In patients between 0 and 14 years of age presenting with no signs of life following blunt trauma, withholding EDT should be considered. Patients between the ages of 15 and 18 should be treated in accordance with adult ATLS principles for the management of thoracic trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Traumatismos Torácicos/mortalidad , Toracotomía , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Heridas Penetrantes/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Humanos , Resucitación/métodos , Traumatismos Torácicos/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia
14.
J Pediatr Surg ; 52(8): 1287-1291, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28073490

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Initiatives exist to prevent pediatric injuries, but targeting these interventions to specific populations is challenging. We hypothesized that mapping pediatric injuries by zip code could be used to identify regions requiring more interventions and resources. METHODS: We queried the trauma registries of two level I trauma centers for children 0-17years of age injured between 2009 and 2013 with home zip codes in our state. Maps were created to identify outlier zip codes. Multivariate linear regression analysis identified predictors within these zip codes. RESULTS: There were 5380 children who resided in the state and were admitted for traumatic injuries during the study period, with hospital costs totaling more than 200 million dollars. Choropleth mapping of patient addresses identified outlier zip codes in our metro area with higher incidences of specific mechanisms of injury and greater hospital charges. Multivariate analysis identified demographic features associated with higher rates of pediatric injuries and hospital charges, to further target interventions. CONCLUSIONS: We identified outlier zip codes in our metro area with higher frequencies of pediatric injuries and higher costs for treatment. These data have helped obtain funding for prevention and education efforts. Techniques such as those presented here are becoming more important as evidence based public health initiatives expand. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Type of Study: Cost Effectiveness, II.


Asunto(s)
Precios de Hospital/tendencias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Sistema de Registros , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Centros Traumatológicos/economía , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología
15.
Surgery ; 161(3): 803-807, 2017 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27814956

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies severely injured children accurately after blunt trauma. We hypothesized that an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted would identify more accurately injured children requiring the highest trauma team activation than age-adjusted hypotension. METHODS: We reviewed all children age 4-16 admitted after blunt trauma with an injury severity score ≥15 from January 2007-June 2013. Criteria used as indicators of need for activation of the trauma team included blood transfusion, emergency operation, or endotracheal intubation within 24 hours of admission. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted represents maximum normal shock index based on age. Cutoffs included shock index >1.22 (ages 4-6), >1.0 (7-12), and >0.9 (13-16). Age-adjusted cutoffs for hypotension were as follows: systolic blood pressure <90 (ages 4-6), systolic blood pressure <100 (7-16). RESULTS: A total of 559 children were included; 21% underwent operation, 37% endotracheal intubation, and 14% transfusion. Hypotension alone predicted poorly the need for operation (13%), endotracheal intubation (17%), or transfusion (22%). Operation (30%), endotracheal intubation (40%), and blood transfusion (53%) were more likely in children with an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted; 25 children required all three interventions, 3 (12%) were hypotensive at presentation, 15 (60%) had an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted is superior to age-adjusted hypotension to identify injured children likely to require emergency operation, endotracheal intubation, or early blood transfusion.


Asunto(s)
Hipotensión/diagnóstico , Choque/diagnóstico , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/fisiopatología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Transfusión Sanguínea , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/terapia , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Evaluación de Necesidades , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/etiología , Choque/terapia , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia
16.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 27(1): 32-35, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27533313

RESUMEN

Introduction In the adult population, assessment of blood consumption (ABC) score [penetrating mechanism, positive focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST), systolic blood pressure < 90, and heart rate (HR) > 120] ≥2 identifies trauma patients who require massive transfusion (MT) with sensitivity and specificity of 75 and 86%. We hypothesized that the adult criteria cannot be applied to children, as the vital sign cut-offs are not age-adjusted. We aimed to determine if the use of a shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA) would improve the discriminate ability of the ABC score in children. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of children age 4 to 15 who received a packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion during admission for trauma between 2008 and 2014 was performed. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of ABC score ≥ 2, elevated SIPA, and age-adjusted ABC score (ABC-S) utilizing SIPA in place of HR and BP, to determine the need for MT. Results A total of 50 children were included, 31 received PRBC transfusion within 6 hours of injury, 7 children had a positive FAST, and 3 suffered penetrating trauma, all in the early transfusion group. ABC score ≥ 2 is 29% sensitive and 100% specific at predicting need for MT while ABC-S score ≥ 1 is 65% sensitive and 84% specific. Conclusions Adult-based criteria for activation of MT perform poorly in the pediatric population. The use of SIPA modestly improves the sensitivity of the ABC score in children; however, the sensitivity and specificity of this score are still worse than when used in an adult population. This suggests the need to develop a new score that takes into account the low rate of penetrating trauma and positive FAST in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque Hemorrágico/diagnóstico , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 27(1): 81-85, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27706523

RESUMEN

Introduction The rapid response team (RRT) is a multidisciplinary team who evaluates hospitalized patients for concerns of nonemergent clinical deterioration. RRT evaluations are mandatory for children whose Pediatric Early Warning System (PEWS) score (assessment of child's behavior, cardiovascular and respiratory status) is ≥4. We aimed to determine if there were differences in characteristics of RRT calls between children who were admitted primarily to either medical or surgical services. We hypothesized that RRT activations would be called for less severely ill children with lower PEWS score on surgical services compared with children admitted to a medical service. Materials and Methods We performed a retrospective review of all children with RRT activations between January 2008 and April 2015 at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. We evaluated the characteristics of RRT calls and made comparisons between RRT calls made for children admitted primarily to medical or surgical services. Results A total of 2,991 RRT activations were called, and 324 (11%) involved surgical patients. Surgical patients were older than medical patients (median: 7 vs. 4 years; p < 0.001). RRT evaluations were called for lower PEWS score in surgical patients compared with medical (median: 3 vs. 4, p < 0.001). Surgical patients were more likely to remain on the inpatient ward following the RRT (51 vs. 39%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to require an advanced airway than medical patients (0.9 vs. 2.1%; p = 0.412). RRT evaluations did not differ between day and night shifts (52% day vs. 48% night; p = 0.17). All surgical patients and all but one medical patient survived the event; surgical patients were more likely to survive to hospital discharge (97 vs. 91%, p < 0.001) Conclusions RRT activations are rare events among pediatric surgical patients. When compared with medical patients, RRT evaluation is requested for surgical patients with a lower PEWS score and these children are less likely to require transfer to a higher level of care, suggesting that pediatric surgery team, families, and nursing staff may not be as comfortable with clinical deterioration.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Colorado , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
J Am Coll Surg ; 223(1): 42-50, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27107826

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Attempts are made with emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) to salvage trauma patients who present to the hospital in extremis. The EDT allows for relief of cardiac tamponade, internal cardiac massage, and proximal hemorrhage control. Minimally invasive techniques, such as endovascular hemorrhage control (EHC) are available, but their noninferiority to EDT remains unproven. Before adopting EHC, it is important to evaluate the current outcomes of EDT. We hypothesized that EDT survival has improved during the last 4 decades, and outcomes stratified by pre-hospital CPR and injury patterns will provide benchmarks for success-to-rescue and survival outcomes for patients in extremis. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive trauma patients undergoing EDT from 1975 to 2014 were prospectively observed as part of quality improvement. Predicted probabilities of survival were adjusted for pre-hospital CPR, mechanism of injury, injury pattern, patient demographics, and time period of EDT using logistic regression. Success-to-rescue was defined as return of spontaneous circulation with blood pressure permissive for transfer to the operating room. RESULTS: There were 1,708 EDTs included, with an overall 419 (24%) success-to-rescue patients and 106 survivors (6%), and 1,394 (79%) of these patients had pre-hospital CPR and 900 (54%) had penetrating wounds. The most common injury patterns were chest (29%), multisystem with head (27%), and multisystem without head (21%). Penetrating injury was associated with higher survival than blunt trauma (9% vs 3% p < 0.001). Success-to-rescue increased from 22% in 1975 to 1979 to 35% over the final 5 years (p < 0.001); survival increased from 5% to 14% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of EDT have improved over the past 40 years. In the last 5 years, STR was 35% and overall survival was 14%. These prospective observational data provide benchmarks to define the role of EHC as an alternative approach for patients arriving in extremis.


Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Hemorragia/terapia , Resucitación/métodos , Toracotomía , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resucitación/mortalidad , Resucitación/normas , Toracotomía/mortalidad , Toracotomía/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
19.
J Pediatr Surg ; 51(7): 1170-3, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27041226

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Following complicated appendicitis, there are limited data available to guide the surgeon regarding antibiotic selection, specifically in regards to route of administration. We hypothesized that among children with appendicitis who are discharged home with antibiotic therapy, the post-discharge readmission and complication rates do not differ between those children who receive IV antibiotics and those who receive PO antibiotics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all children discharged home on antibiotics following appendectomy at a single institution between 11/10-10/14. We compared outcomes including ED and hospital readmission rates, and development of postoperative complications, between those children who were discharged on IV antibiotics and those discharged on PO antibiotics. RESULTS: 325 children were discharged with antibiotics following appendectomy (n=291 PO antibiotics group; n=34 IV group). On both univariate and multivariate analysis, rate of each complication did not differ between the two groups including inpatient readmission (5% PO vs. 6% IV; p=0.8), ED readmission (10% vs. 11%; p=0.8), postdischarge complications related to the operation (10% vs. 15%; p=0.4), or abscess development post-discharge (4% vs. 3%; p=1). CONCLUSIONS: Among children with complicated appendicitis who are discharged home with ongoing antibiotic therapy, our data demonstrate no differences in outcomes between those children who receive IV and PO antibiotics. Further data, collected in a prospective fashion, are needed to clarify the role of IV and PO antibiotics among children with perforated appendicitis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Administración Oral , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Ann Surg ; 263(6): 1051-9, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26720428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Massive transfusion protocols (MTPs) have become standard of care in the management of bleeding injured patients, yet strategies to guide them vary widely. We conducted a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial (RCT) to test the hypothesis that an MTP goal directed by the viscoelastic assay thrombelastography (TEG) improves survival compared with an MTP guided by conventional coagulation assays (CCA). METHODS: This RCT enrolled injured patients from an academic level-1 trauma center meeting criteria for MTP activation. Upon MTP activation, patients were randomized to be managed either by an MTP goal directed by TEG or by CCA (ie, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, platelet count). Primary outcome was 28-day survival. RESULTS: One hundred eleven patients were included in an intent-to-treat analysis (TEG = 56, CCA = 55). Survival in the TEG group was significantly higher than the CCA group (log-rank P = 0.032, Wilcoxon P = 0.027); 20 deaths in the CCA group (36.4%) compared with 11 in the TEG group (19.6%) (P = 0.049). Most deaths occurred within the first 6 hours from arrival (21.8% CCA group vs 7.1% TEG group) (P = 0.032). CCA patients required similar number of red blood cell units as the TEG patients [CCA: 5.0 (2-11), TEG: 4.5 (2-8)] (P = 0.317), but more plasma units [CCA: 2.0 (0-4), TEG: 0.0 (0-3)] (P = 0.022), and more platelets units [CCA: 0.0 (0-1), TEG: 0.0 (0-0)] (P = 0.041) in the first 2 hours of resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a goal-directed, TEG-guided MTP to resuscitate severely injured patients improves survival compared with an MTP guided by CCA and utilizes less plasma and platelet transfusions during the early phase of resuscitation.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/etiología , Trastornos de la Coagulación Sanguínea/terapia , Transfusión Sanguínea/normas , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Resucitación/métodos , Tromboelastografía/métodos , Adulto , Colorado , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Centros Traumatológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...